You can shape the content in all parts of the publication - we rely on your submissions. We want to hear from psychologists from all corners and levels of the discipline, from the most eminent to first-time contributors (see below).
In return we help you to get your message across to a large and diverse audience. The Psychologist is all about diversity. Write for The Psychologist and you will be reaching a massive audience in comparison with most academic and professional outlets: more than 50,000 in print and many more online. The readers will be from all corners of the discipline, as well as members of the public, media, policy makers and more. Many of our authors have reported that writing for us was an important step on the path to impact, opening all sorts of doors to public engagement opportunities and professional collaborations.
Contributing to The Psychologist is also about diversity of format: the chances are there will be something to suit what you have to say and how you want to say it.
What are we looking for?
Topics which will inform our wide audience, written in a style which will engage them. We aim to publish quality, accessible overviews of published research and developments in practice, along with a wide range of more personal formats and all our regular sections ('News', 'Letters', 'Reviews', 'Careers', 'Looking back' etc).
Let's take a closer look at what we do.
If you have a news story in psychology, get in touch on [email protected] or tweet us @psychmag.
Submit your letters to [email protected], marked clearly 'Letter for publication in The Psychologist'. Include a postal address. Letters over 500 words are less likely to be published. The Editor reserves the right to edit, shorten or publish extracts from letters. Space does not permit the publication of every letter received. Letters to the Editor are not normally acknowledged.
Get in touch via [email protected] if you would like to write an 'Opinion' piece or take part in a 'Head to head' debate - our stated aim is to provide a forum 'for communication, discussion and controversy', so we would very much like to hear from you.
We are looking for engaging and informative overviews of published research and developments in practice, suitable for our large and diverse audience of professional psychologists. We are not a 'first port of call' outlet for the publishing of original research: think more journalism than journal, but still clearly evidence-based.
Articles can be up to 3000 words. Increasingly we prefer our authors to write in a journalistic style where references do not serve to interrupt the flow of the piece, and where they are included as genuine sources for further reading rather than as a comprehensive list. Our online version can be fully hyperlinked.
Submission of an article to The Psychologist implies that it has not been published elsewhere and that it is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Because of heavy pressure on space, publication of accepted articles may not be possible for several months. Increasingly, though, we do have the option of 'online only' or 'online first' publication.
We are very interested to hear more about the person in psychological research or practice. If a participant in your research or practice would be willing to share their experience, you could then add your perspective and perhaps that of a third party making use of your work. See this example.
If you have never published in The Psychologist before, and are perhaps in the early stages of your journey in psychology but looking to announce yourself as a genuine 'new voice', then we are here to help. Write about anything: your degree, your postgraduate research, life, the universe and everything! The only criteria are that the articles should
- engage and inform our large and diverse audience,
- be sole authored, by someone who has not had a full article published in The Psychologist before,
- be written exclusively for The Psychologist, and
- be fewer than 1800 words (plus up to 20 essential supporting references if appropriate).
The emphasis is very much on writing talent: Can you grab the reader’s attention and hold it throughout? Can you step up to the mark and announce yourself on a large stage?
In 20 years’ time, when you are an eminent psychologist changing the way we think about ourselves and our discipline, we want to be able to look back at your first work in The Psychologist. It helps if you can give an indication of your own personal involvement in an area of research or practice, to show why you are 'one to watch' - this is an excellent example.
For special issues, we are ideally looking for broad, overarching topics which can engage and inform our audience on a personal and professional level. Previous examples have included driving, the senses, and time. Special issues should attempt to make links across the discipline, showcasing a diversity of perspective and format. The first step is to contact the editor to discuss the theme and potential contributors.
Sometimes a 'full' article doesn't seem appropriate and you simply want to tell us about your work. What's your typical day like? What are the highs and lows? How did you get into that line of work, and where might it lead? What are the current professional challenges? We consider pieces of up to 1800 words, or if appropriate we can arrange for an interview with our freelance writer.
Interviews and 'One on one'
If you or somebody you know would prefer to feature in an interview or a short 'one on one' questionnaire, giving a mix of professional and personal insight, get in touch to discuss options.
We are now considering reviews of psychology in any form of media: books, films, TV, radio, newspapers, websites and blogs, apps, plays, music, exhibitions, etc etc. Reviews can be anything from 100 words to 1000 words, but generally tend to be 300-500. If you have seen or heard something suitable recently and you are interested in contributing, please contact the editor.
This section covers the history of psychology and the psychology of history. Articles tend to be 1800-3000 words long (with a preference for shorter), and - like all writing in The Psychologist - should attempt to engage as well as inform. See examples here and contact the editor to discuss your ideas.
How do I go about writing my piece?
Contact the editor to discuss all of the above options, by email or on +44 (0)116 252 9573.
You can also see the archive and digital sample issues for examples of different formats, or download our iOS / Android app.
When you are happy with your work, send it as an attachment to [email protected], or post three copies to The Psychologist at the Society’s office. To allow anonymous review, authors’ names and full contact details should not appear on the typescript, but should be presented on a separate page.
What happens next?
After an initial assessment of suitability by the editor, our feature articles are blind peer-reviewed to ensure scientific quality. The editor reserves the right to edit all copy accepted for publication. However, this is a collaborative process with the author, aiming for the best possible end product in terms of layout and accessibility.
An author or the editor may feel that an article is suitable for web-only presentation due to considerations of time, length or breadth of interest.
For more detail on the policy and procedures of The Psychologist, please request them by emailing [email protected].
An author may express a preference for their article being presented on the web only, or the editor may feel that this form of presentation is more appropriate due to considerations of:
- time: whether the time taken in the review and production process would render the issue less relevant or even irrelevant;
- breadth of interest: whether the subject seems too specialist in interest to warrant the space in the print version; and
- length: whether the article is too long to be considered for the print version, i.e. significantly over 3000 words.
Timeliness is the most important issue, as the other two can often change as a result of the review / revision process. However, the second and third considerations may also arise after review and even after revision, and it is possible that it will be at this stage that web-only presentation will be considered.
The editor will seek the author's agreement concerning web-only presentation. If this is not received the editor will not pursue that avenue, and may or may not then enter the article into the normal process for the print version.
In reviewing the article, the general principles set out in the Psychologist Policy Document will apply. The editor will seek the views of an associate editor if appropriate, particularly where it is felt that views aired could potentially impact on the reputation of the Society. The editor's decision on whether or not to include material on the web is final.
Please note that although there is clearly still quality control, these articles are not peer reviewed in the same way as the majority of the material in the print version. As with all articles, views of named writers are the views exclusively of those writers; publication does not constitute endorsement by the Society.
Please contact the editor via [email protected] if you are interested in submitting web-only material.
Still not convinced?
The Psychologist team are there to advise and guide you through the process. It can be a very positive and valuable experience for you. Don't just take our word for it: here's what some past authors have had to say about writing for us:
"Reach the largest, most diverse audience of psychologists in the UK (as well as many others around the world); work with a wonderfully supportive editorial team; submit thought pieces, reviews, interviews, analytic work, and a whole lot more. Start writing for The Psychologist now before you think of something else infinitely less important to do!"
Robert Sternberg, Oklahoma State University
"I've read this before, but only when I'd experienced it myself did I really believe it…writing for The Psychologist helped me to reach people my usual publications don't reach. Several of them supplied me, spontaneously, with useful sources, information and examples of real-world applications"
Professor Miles Hewstone, University of Oxford
"Articles in The Psychologist reach a larger and more general UK Psychology audience than most scientific journals. Reading articles by others in The Psychologist broadens my perspective"
Professor Jon Driver, University College London
"It's important for psychologists to develop ways of writing that really communicate: not just journal intricacy and not just glossy-magazine chat. The Psychologist offers a fine opportunity for this development. The editors are excellent, in their work with authors and in their production of this wonderful publication."
Keith Oatley, University of Toronto
"Couldn't be happier with the editorial process which was highly professional, very efficient and extremely supportive and responsive"
Professor Martyn Barrett, University of Surrey
"Writing for The Psychologist was a challenge - it made me think beyond the usual student essay style and gain experience in writing for a wide audience"
Alexa Ipsas, University of Edinburgh
"Writers can fear that they have to work alone. In my experience writing for The Psychologist, the process was characterised by clear, supportive, friendly and very helpful editing, which made the whole task manageable and pleasant. The readership meant that ideas were disseminated to a very wide audience"
Professor Irvine Gersch, University of East London
"The motto "be the change you want to see" has driven me through my career and has been the rationale for many of the challenges I have made to the status quo. If you want to see the face of The Psychologist change, why not share your ideas and become a part of it yourself?"
Jeune Guishard-Pine, Consultant Psychologist in the NHS and in private practice
There is an abundance of contemporary topics within psychology that are likely to be of interest to many people. Identify one, share your informed opinion on it by sending it to The Psychologist, get published, and enjoy the reward of receiving feedback and input from many others.
Gaby Pfeifer, University of Sussex