...debates

A letter from our March edition.
The discussion continues.
Letters respond to Patrick Vesey.
The debate continues.
A letter from our March edition.
Letters respond to our February feature.
A letter from our March edition.
James A. Grange with the lead letter from our March edition.
A letter from our March edition advocates consortium-based undergraduate projects.
A letter from our February edition.
A letter from the February edition.
Dawn Thorley with a letter from the February edition.
A letter from our February edition.
Dr Fenja V. Ziegler (University of Lincoln) and Dr Richard J. Tunney (University of Nottingham) respond to the article in our December edition.
A letter responds to an article in our December edition.

 

A letter from our February edition.
The debate continues, with a letter from John Raven.
Rebecca McElroy considers pathological demand avoidance.
John Cooter's letter responds to a review.
Dr Sara Cureton responds to a letter in our December issue.
Professor Peter E. Morris and Dr Catherine O. Fritz on replication and research fraud.
A letter from our January issue.
James Russell reflects on nearly half a century of doing psychology.
As the UK's Parliament votes to allow bombing in Syria, we ask - are there evidence-based ways to resolve this conflict?
Stuart J. Ritchie (University of Edinburgh) responds to Oliver James's letter from the December edition.