Suicidality – what is ‘help’?

John Raven writes.

The BPS position statement Understanding and Preventing Suicide: A Psychological Perspective (to which attention is drawn in the November issue of The Psychologist) may appear to be benign. But, in reality, it further marginalises the increasing number of people who, while still of sound mind, wish to choose to die by a means of their own choosing. Its tone and approach supports those, including often incomprehensibly vicious police, who feel they have a right to impose, on others, by force if necessary, activities which they believe to be good and right (often claiming that they are in the recipients’ best interests) without regard for many of the consequences for those concerned.

The right to life has become, not merely corrupted into a requirement to live (under any circumstances), but also into policies to further constrict access to arrangements which would enable those who wish to die in their own way to do just that. (For example, access to drugs and deployable bridges is to be further restricted.) The degrading conditions in which many older people are forced to live out their lives in state-mandated regimes of ‘care’ are becoming well known. But they are hardly better than the lifestyles imposed on many by the destitution manufactured by the ‘benefits’ system. As psychologists, we would do better to examine and challenge the thoughtways and processes which promote these conditions rather than promoting psycho-medical ‘cures’ for the problems they create at an individual level. How does the way we organise work and society promote isolation, depression and numerous other ‘medical’ conditions?

More basically still, we would do better to examine the social processes which so often corrupt what appear to be well-intentioned social policies into their opposites: How a does a right to ‘education” and personal development become a compulsion to submit to endless destructive treatments at the hands of ‘welfare’ agencies? How does a right to work become a compulsion to spend one’s time applying for non-existent zero-hours contract jobs and one’s days travelling to those workplaces?

One could have hoped for a more balanced statement – preferably one avoiding the pejorative and prejudicial term suicide itself: While the majority of the population support a right to die by a means of one’s own choosing (and obtain assistance in so doing), there is much less support for the notion of assisted suicide.

It is extraordinary that psychologists are much more willing to go to great lengths to provide services to ‘help’ people to stay alive even if they wish to die than to help them to die in a manner of their own choosing if they wish so to do.

John Raven
Edinburgh

BPS Members can discuss this article

Already a member? Or Create an account

Not a member? Find out about becoming a member or subscriber

Comments

People should have choice to live or die. We never asked for a life on this earth, we were given it. It should be a human right to be able to chose when to leave it and how we do. 

I guess assisted suicide is somewhat a "taboo" subject. Many people do not like to talk about death and, when assisting someone to die blame has to be given to someone, right? This could well be a major factor why endless amount of help is offered because no one wants that blame. Would it be acceptable for a medical professional to euthanise someone because they don't like their life? A lot of people would disagree, but then that brings us back to having the right to live, but also having the right to die. It is our life, why can't we decide to take it? Because society think that we must live out our life and it is the right thing to do?