...looks back
Ludy T. Benjamin Jr on a fascinating trial and a psychologist’s role in it
Mark M. Smith on when ‘looking’ back makes less sense
Can we really understand how people in the past perceived their world in sensory terms? Can we ever reach an understanding of what, say, 18th-century Australia sounded like? What smells meant to...
Nestar Russell explores the early evolution of Stanley Milgram’s first official obedience to authority experiment
Ron Roberts on the continuing relevance of Thomas Szasz, now in his 90th year.
Arthur I. Miller on a meeting of minds between Carl Jung and the physicist Wolfgang Pauli
Hazel Stevenson on Sylvia Downs’ lifetime of achievement in occupational psychology
In November 2009 Sylvia Downs received a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Division of Occupational Psychology, recognising her outstanding contribution to our profession. As this 83-year-old...
Joan Bliss on her memories of working with the great Swiss psychologist
Larry Weiskrantz recalls the conditions surrounding a rare ‘discovery’ in psychology – response to visual stimuli without conscious perception
It is difficult to pinpoint just when the idea of blindsight first emerged, although, as is perhaps usual in such matters, there are a number of claimants. But we can date the year when the word ‘...
Peter Garrard on the uses of retrospective language analysis
Roger Smith argues that the historical story is not dispensable – it is key to being a good scientist
Henry Ford supposedly snapped: ‘History is more or less bunk.’ Ford, I think, meant that if we pay history much attention, it holds us back. Many scientists agree: better to construct knowledge,...
A peculiarly influential and controversial 1920s employment test, from Thomas Edison, by Paul Collins; plus an account of how it felt to resist Milgram.
Dean Keith Simonton examines biographical influences on composition and eminence
Chris Lerwill digs into the archives, 200 years after Darwin’s birth and 150 after the publication of On the Origin of Species.
Barbara Tizard on John Bowlby – the origins of his ideas, their impact and his often underestimated willingness to revise them
John Bowlby (1907–1990) first attained fame – some would say notoriety – in 1951, with the publication of his monograph Maternal Care and Mental Health. In it he presented evidence that maternal...
Is the ‘cognitive revolution’ a myth? Sandy Hobbs thinks the term is inaccurate and unhelpful; Jeremy Trevelyan Burman disagrees
Uta Frith on a couple of colourful characters – Neil O’Connor and Beate Hermelin; and Julie Perks on the Hipp Chronoscope
Everyone knows that London in the Sixties was a cool place to be, but few know that this was true not only for music, art and fashion, but also for psychology. At the Institute of Psychiatry you...
John Waller on how distress and pious fear have led to bizarre outbreaks across the ages.
The year was 1374. In dozens of medieval towns scattered along the valley of the River Rhine hundreds of people were seized by an agonising compulsion to dance. Scarcely pausing to rest or eat,...
Gustav Jahoda on the German philosopher and psychologist Johann Friedrich Herbart, and his view of the mind as a starry sky of Newtonian forces.
Ludy T. Benjamin, Jr revisits the promises of British practical psychology.
One hundred and fifty years ago this month, the grand new bell – a mind-boggling 16 tons in weight – rang out across London from the Great Clock of Westminster for the first time on 31 May...
Peter Lamont with a brief history of extraordinary psychological feats, and their relevance for our concept of psychology and science
Richard Howard on a psychologist who is remembered for educational testing, but whose interests covered the full gamut of individual differences.
Christopher Spencer and Kate Gee take a historical look at the development of the field; and Jon Sutton examines the wilderness of the mind
Herbert A. Friedman on the why and how of an unusual form of propaganda.
Following on from last month’s article, Ann Clarke and Alan Clarke reflect on their five decades of research.
John Hall revisits the impact of a key text on intellectual disability, 50 years after it was published