Government still favours regulation by HPC; new Society journal and public engagement project; statistical reporting; and more
Government still favours regulation by HPC The government continues to seek the regulation of applied psychologists, psychotherapists and counsellors through the Health Professions Council (HPC), the statutory body that currently regulates 13 health-related professions, including arts therapists and dieticians. The news came with publication of its White Paper in February: Trust, Assurance and Safety: The Regulation of Health Professionals in the 21st Century. In contrast to its position on psychology, the government has said pharmacy will be regulated by a new dedicated body, the General Pharmaceutical Council.The White Paper indicates the government continues to assume that the majority of people providing psychological services do so in the health sector, particularly the NHS.

Government still favours regulation by HPC

The government continues to seek the regulation of applied psychologists, psychotherapists and counsellors through the Health Professions Council (HPC), the statutory body that currently regulates 13 health-related professions, including arts therapists and dieticians. The news came with publication of its White Paper in February: Trust, Assurance and Safety: The Regulation of Health Professionals in the 21st Century. In contrast to its position on psychology, the government has said pharmacy will be regulated by a new dedicated body, the General Pharmaceutical Council.The White Paper indicates the government continues to assume that the majority of people providing psychological services do so in the health sector, particularly the NHS. In fact, as the Society has strived to communicate to government, most applied psychologists work in other sectors, including in business, education and forensic settings. That’s why the Society has been campaigning, together with eight other professional bodies, for the psychological professions to be regulated by a dedicated independent Psychological Professions Council.The HPC has also failed to grasp the diverse roles played by psychologists and the relevance this has for the regulation of psychology. In a press release it said it welcomed the White Paper’s statement that ‘counsellors, health psychologists and psychotherapists are to be regulated by the HPC’ (emphasis added). But the government’s White Paper states clearly that the HPC will regulate applied psychologists, which would include the large number who practise outside the health sector.

Society President Pam Maras said: ‘The BPS remains committed to the statutory regulation of psychology. However, our responses to government consultations have to date been largely ignored. We are extremely concerned about contradictions in proposals outlined in the White Paper and comments from the proposed regulator. Our only commitment is to public protection; we do not believe that what is currently proposed will provide this.’ The President’s negotiating team met at a swiftly convened teleconference in March to plan a response to the White Paper.
In a timely reminder of the need for the statutory regulation of psychologists, a man was jailed for five years in February, having worked as a bogus forensic psychologist for over 25 years. Gene Morrison acted as an expert witness on over 700 cases after buying false qualifications from a sham university. Pam Maras said: ‘This is an interesting case, as under the latest proposals from the HPC it is unlikely that such a person would have been identified as bogus.’    CJ


New Society journal out now!

The first issue of the Journal of Neuropsychology was published by the British Psychological Society in March, and presented at the Society’s Conference in York. The new journal is devoted to the study of brain–behaviour relationships. The focus is on studies of patients with brain dysfunctions, but this multidisciplinary field also incorporates contributions from developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science. Journal editor Edward de Haan (Utrecht University) said: ‘Neuropsychological research is buoyant, and the need for a journal that promotes theory-driven original research has already been demonstrated by some 75 submissions in the last six months. This first issue exemplifies the ambitions of this new journal – I think it’s full of thought-provoking new insights.’In the March issue, Della Sala and Cubelli propose a new explanation for mirror writing, a phenomenon that can be observed in young children as well as in neurological patients. Next up Bonifazi et al. explore the effect of tool use on visual-tactile extinction in patients with right hemisphere lesions. They demonstrate that tool use provokes a change in the cerebral spatial representation of the hand. There are three contributions in line with the recent trend to study the interaction between cognitive and emotional processes from a neuropsychological perspective. Kalbe et al. investigate affective and cognitive components of ‘theory of mind’ tasks. The role of emotional processes and consciousness in adolescent psychogenic amnesia is investigated by Reinhold and Markowitsch. Finally, Doninger and Bylsma study patients suffering from Alzheimer’s-type dementia with the traditional and the emotional Stroop tests, and observe a separate interference effect on the emotional Stroop.
Next up, McKenna and Bell describe a new test of fitness to drive following cerebral pathology, and Smith and co-workers put forward a new method for scoring organisational approach on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure. Finally, in the ‘Case study’ category, Gozzi et al. present a patient with a selective short-term memory deficit, investigating whether STM is involved in decision making.
De Haan says: ‘The Journal of Neuropsychology is off to a good start and promises to become a valuable source of information in this expanding field. The future is bright.’    JS

Society members can subscribe to the new journal for just £20 (£15 student members). See; tel: 0116 252 9537; or e-mail [email protected].


Significant improvement

THE way statistics are reported in psychology journals is showing signs of improvement, according to an analysis by researchers at La Trobe University in Melbourne. Geoff Cumming and colleagues investigated how reporting practices in 10 leading international psychology journals had changed between 1998 and 2006. Cumming’s team focused particularly on whether the recommendations of the American Psychological Association’s 2001 Publication Manual had been heeded.
The 2001 Manual, which featured input from statistics luminaries such as the late Lee Cronbach and Jacob Cohen, stated that confidence intervals (CIs) are ‘in general the best reporting strategy’. Confidence intervals illustrate the range within which you would expect a true population value to lie given your data. The argument is that whereas null hypothesis testing only demonstrates the presence of an effect or not, CIs together with effect sizes show how large any observed effect is, and how precisely you can estimate it.
Cumming and colleagues’ analysis found 3.7 per cent of papers published in 1998 reported CIs compared with 9.2 per cent in 2003–2004 and 10.6 per cent in 2005–2006. There was also a clear rise in the use of figures with error bars, from 11 per cent of papers in 1998 to 24.7 per cent in 2003–2004 and 37.8 per cent in 2005–2006. ‘We were astonished and pleased,’ Professor Cumming told us. ‘The whole problem isn’t solved but something has changed, people are perhaps more open to persuasion now about changing how stats are reported.’ The most progressive journal was the Journal of Experimental Psychology (General) aided perhaps by the editors’ posting of statistical advice on their website ( Overall, however, little statistical advice was offered by journals, and null hypothesis significance testing continued to dominate.
In their analysis published in Psychological Science, Cumming and his colleagues argue it is urgent for psychology to change emphasis from the dichotomous decision making of null hypothesis significance testing to estimation of effect size. Indeed, Cumming told us misperceptions and misunderstandings will continue while null hypothesis testing dominates. To illustrate this, he has contrasted the effect the two ways of reporting the same data can have on readers.
Imagine two studies investigating an effect of therapy. The studies have largely overlapping confidence intervals, but one reports a significant effect of therapy whereas the other does not. Cumming has found that readers presented only with null hypothesis significance testing tended to respond that there was clear conflict and disagreement between the two studies. By contrast, readers presented with the overlapping confidence intervals tended to say the findings of the two studies were fairly consistent. ‘The response to the CIs is correct and justified,’ Cumming said. ‘Psychology should move towards an approach that asks not Does the therapy work? but How big is the effect of the therapy and how accurate is your estimate of that effect?, which gives you much more information that just – Is it significant?’
Professor Cumming’s colleague Dr Fiona Fidler, also at La Trobe University, has studied statistical reform in other disciplines. For example, she has found that influential medical researchers in the 1970s and 1980s persuaded the International Council of Medical Journal Editors to adopt new conventions, including the use of confidence intervals, that led to improved practice by over 300 medical journals. Cumming believes that to achieve the same reform in psychology, we need ‘more textbooks, more software, and more institutional leadership’.
From correspondence with nine editors conducted as part of their analysis in Psychological Science, Cumming’s team have found that psychology journals editors are knowledgeable and supportive of statistical reform, but that they don’t see the issue as a priority and they don’t want to be prescriptive. ‘The editors are mostly concerned with getting the best papers in their journals,’ Cumming said. ‘Meanwhile researchers are principally concerned with publishing in the best journals – so we currently have a circle of inertia.’
Last year the APA started the groundwork for a revision of its 2001 Publication Manual, which Cumming is hoping could provide the opportunity for further reform.    CJ


Are young girls increasingly sexualised?

YES, according to a new report from the American Psychological Association (see And the proliferation of sexualised images of girls and young women in advertising, merchandising, and media is harmful to girls’ self-image and healthy development.
The APA Task Force studied published research on the content and effects of virtually every form of media. Sexualisation was defined as occurring when a person’s value comes only from their sexual appeal or behaviour, to the exclusion of other characteristics, and when a person is sexually objectified, e.g. made into a ‘thing’ for another’s sexual use.
According to Dr Eileen L. Zurbriggen, chair of the Task Force and Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, ‘We have ample evidence to conclude that sexualisation has negative effects in a variety of domains, including cognitive functioning, physical and mental health and healthy sexual development.’
However, The Psychologist put it to Dr Zurbriggen that the vast majority of this evidence concerned women and idealised body image, rather than young girls and sexualisation. ‘The Task Force name, and focus, was determined before we began our review of the literature,’ Dr Zurbriggen replied. ‘One of our recommendations is that more research be done in this area. Nonetheless, the focus of the report is on girls, and we review studies, interpret data, and draw on relevant theory with this population in mind.’
The report received considerable media attention. According to Zurbriggen, ‘one aspect of some of the coverage that has been unfortunate is the attention to one specific example or another. We tried to make clear that the problem isn’t one particular doll or TV show, but rather the saturation of these sorts of images and the absence of other images. For example, last year Kelly and Smith’s study found that approximately three-quarters of all characters in G-rated US movies were male. Such movies are presumably a non-sexualised medium, so we’re not seeing sexualised presentations. Unfortunately, we’re also not seeing girls and women. So the message seems to be, if you’re not sexy in a certain way, you don’t exist.’    JS


Well-being in communities

I FELT privileged to attend a thought-provoking one-day event in February at the Society’s London offices. The day, organised by the College of Fellows, ‘Promoting Mental Health and Well-being in Communities: Psychological Perspectives’ was very much a call for action, with speakers asking a range of critical questions about the role of psychology in meeting the needs of communities.
Sean Cameron welcomed delegates and observed that psychology is increasingly compartmentalised into micro-perspectives and in danger of ‘losing the big picture’. He paraphrased a recommendation from the recent report on the role of his branch of applied psychology by stating: ‘Educational psychologists should get out a bit more’ (Farrell et al., 2006). Out of schools and into communities to ask relevant and useful questions in line with Ignacio Martín-Baró’s view that ‘psychology must stop focusing attention on itself, stop worrying about its scientific and social status, and instead propose an effective service to the needs of the population’. Those with an interest in critical psychology will know that in 1989 Martín-Baró’ was taken into the quadrangle of the University of Central America in El Salvador and executed.
The lack of influence psychology has in planning and policy was a constant refrain. David Fryer, from the University of Stirling, posed questions with calm and focused passion. These included How do we move away from a psychology that is part of the problem to being part of the solution? One suggestion is to develop a set of tools to challenge oppression – a psychology of transformation which is ‘concerned with understanding people in the context of their communities, the prevention of problems of living, the celebration of human diversity, and the pursuit of social justice through social action’ (Nelson & Prilleltensky, 2005, p.22).
The day perfectly illustrated the paradigm shift towards community, positive and critical approaches that reject deficit models, and one of the most moving contributions reminded us of the role of social conditions, such as mass unemployment, in undermining the mental health of communities. Cathy McCormack recounted her experiences on the Easterhouse township in Glasgow and the realisation that it was the living conditions that were ‘mad’ not her: ‘It was bad enough living in a damp flat without getting the blame for it.’ We psychologists can deliver CBT sessions to change cognitions, but unless we help communities change their living conditions we perpetuate the vicious circle that Cathy calls ‘the war without bullets’.
Equally moving was the contribution of Elaine Swift and George Black who shared their experiences of mental health problems through ‘community artivism’: ‘the deployment of the creative and performing arts…to challenge stereotypes and stigma about mental health’ Their story was a triumph of love in the face of adversity and prejudice.
Serdar Degirmencioglu from Beykent University identified the ‘big constructs’ that need to be addressed by psychologists as culture, ethos, community, media and human rights. He recommended a developmental analysis that cuts across disciplinary boundaries and outlined his work involving young people in community programmes. His example of youth participation in a response to an earthquake was a perfect illustration of how psychologists can use tools such as coaching to support community aims and increase psychological well-being among participants.
Ed Cairns (University of Ulster) suggested that ‘an end of conflict does not equal peace’ and gave grounded examples of how psychology can inform policy; for example regarding the ‘contact hypothesis’, the idea that putting opposing sides together in a place will automatically solve problems. Policy makers ‘jumped on’ this approach; but contact alone is not enough, and other factors, such as knowledge of group status, must also be present. The implications for integrated schools were explored and conclusions reached regarding how politicians influence schools and children but this might not be an ideal way to encourage change. Adults also need to take responsibility for moving out of conflict and towards forgiveness.
The discussion groups and plenary session offered a welcome opportunity to reflect on the day and perhaps, most importantly, for delegates to plan how they can empower communities in meaningful and practical ways.     Miles Thomas

Farrell, P. et al. (2006). A review of the functions and contribution of educational psychologists in England and Wales in light of ‘Every child matters: Change for children’. Research Report 792. London: DfES.
Nelson, G. & Prilleltensky, I. (Eds.) (2005). Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.


Grant proposals and peacocks’ tails

With funding competition fiercer than ever, do you find yourself spending increasingly more time justifying your merits in lengthy grant proposals? A contributor to The Lancet medical journal sees an analogy: ‘Like the peacock’s tail, these academic appendages are becoming ever longer and more brilliantly mesmerising with time.’ One solution to ‘the expenditure of so much energy on relentless self-promotion’, proposes David Whiteman of the Queensland Institute of Medical Research, is for unique portable identifiers to be developed that could be linked via the internet to all the research activities of publicly funded researchers. He says this would provide ‘a constantly updated and transparent record of research output’ for those who need to know. What do our readers think?    CJ


Mental health and pregnancy

THE National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has issued guidance on the care and treatment of women with mental health disorders during pregnancy and in the first year after giving birth (see
The guideline is the first of its kind to make specific recommendations on the identification, treatment and management of all mental health disorders including anxiety disorders, depression and schizophrenia.
This guideline is an important step forward in improving healthcare professionals’ understanding of antenatal and postnatal mental health disorders and offering them guidance in both spotting the early signs of new conditions and encouraging women to discuss existing ones.
Dr Steve Pilling, Consultant Clinical Psychologist and a member of the guideline development group, said: ‘Despite the fact that around 15 per cent of women have a mental health disorder in the antenatal or postnatal period, many women do not come forward because they are concerned they will be perceived as a bad mother. It is important that women know that there are a number of effective treatments available for mental health disorders.’
The patient representative on the group, Fiona Shaw, said: ‘Having a baby is a time of huge change – emotionally, financially, socially and physically – and any woman can find herself needing help. Hopefully, this guidance will help women feel more confident that healthcare professionals will take their mental health symptoms and concerns seriously, rather than suffering with their difficulties in silence.’     FC



Deafness Research UK are offering vacation scholarships to provide promising undergraduates with ‘hands-on’ experience of research into deafness or a related field during their summer vacation. Scholarships are available for up to eight weeks’ work and offer a stipend of £175 per week. Applications are invited from potential supervisors within hearing research teams at UK universities or research centres.

Further details:

The ESRC is offering the annual 1+3 and +3 Proposal (open) Studentship Competition to support PhD study. For the 2007 competition, there are approximately 100 studentships available. The deadline for the applications is 1 May 2007. The 1+3/+3 Nomination (quota) Studentships are also being offered. These are studentships that have been allocated directly to a department/school (outlets). Students interested in applying for a 1+3 or +3 Nomination (quota) should speak to the department where they wish to study. The deadline for applications is 8 May 2007. Students may only apply for either the Proposal (open) or the Nominated (quota) award.

Further details:

The Alzheimer’s Society are offering PhD studentships to support postgraduate students who wish to pursue an academic career in the field of dementia. Awards are for three years. Applications must be submitted by the prospective supervisor, a named prospective student is not required to make an application. The closing date for applications is 25 May 2007. The Alzheimer’s Society also offer Research Fellowships for postdoctoral research. These provide funding for studies into the cause, cure or care for dementia.
o Further details:
The Big Lottery Fund offers grants to a wide range of projects. Those that may be of particular interest to the psychology community include:
Mental Health Matters (Wales) supports projects that promote the rehabilitation and independence of people with serious mental health problems; support for people at greatest risk of developing serious mental health problems and support for people at greatest risk of suicide. Applications can be made by voluntary and community organisations and public and private sector organisations.
Family Learning (England) supports projects that involve adults and children learning together to participate in and enjoy educational activity more; provide family members with more skills and knowledge (including confidence and effective communication); and assist parents and carers to interact positively with their children and support them in learning. Applications are welcome from a wide range of organisations including charities, schools and not-for-profit companies.    
Children’s Play (England); this initiative is based on the recommendations of the 2004 play review ‘Getting Serious About Play’. Organisations that have an interest in children’s play should engage with their local authority about prospective projects.
Playful Ideas (England) also supports projects that focus on innovation and new ways of providing for children’s play. Voluntary and community groups, the social enterprise sector, and town and parish councils can apply.
Health Families: Child’s Play and Way of Life (Wales) seeks to support projects that promote healthy and active lifestyles amongst children and families by focusing on children’s play, healthy eating and physical activity. Voluntary, community or public sector organisations can apply.
Investigating in Communities (Scotland) invests in initiatives including: Dynamic Inclusive Communities – to help build stronger more vibrant communities; Life Transitions – supporting projects that help people deal with change in their lives and encourage them to move on; Supporting 21st Century Life – to invest in projects that enable people to cope with new patterns of life and the pace of change communities are experiencing. A wide range of groups can apply for funding including charities, voluntary and community groups, local authorities, social enterprises or health boards.
Further details:
For a list of current funding opportunities go to
Funding bodies should e-mail news to Elizabeth Beech on [email protected] for possible inclusion.


Mystery solved?

ALARGE American parapsychology laboratory has closed after nearly 30 years of experimentation.
In a statement on its website, the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) Lab states: ‘After more than a quarter century of systematic empirical study of consciousness-related physical phenomena, it is our sense that many of the salient correlates of these intriguing anomalies have now been identified. There are many important questions still to be addressed, but these will require an even broader interdisciplinary approach to the topic.’ Members of the disbanded Lab will become part of the International Consciousness Research Laboratories consortium, based in New Jersey.
Professor Chris French, who heads the recently formed Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit at Goldsmiths College, University of London, said that within the parapsychology community and among informed sceptics, the PEAR research was respected. ‘I wasn’t convinced, but I was intrigued,’ he told us.
According to French, while UK parapsychology research is booming, American researchers are struggling for funding. French said the health of UK parapsychology was thanks largely to the late Bob Morris, who in 1985 became the inaugural holder of the Koestler Chair of Parapsychology at Edinburgh University (see    CJ


Palliative care

THE second reading of the Palliative Care Bill in the House of Lords saw reference to psychologists and the British Psychological Society. Baroness Emerton quoted Dr Christine Kalus, consultant clinical psychologist and chair of the Society’s working party on end-of-life issues. Kalus said that it is ‘imperative that psychologically trained practitioners are part of the core multi-professional team to offer guidance, support and supervision to the staff and also appropriate assessment interventions for the individual patients, their families and following death for the bereaved as appropriate.’Kalus had pointed to an assessment being developed in the UK by clinical psychologists based on work in the US – the Distress Thermometer (DT). The aim is to help individuals name and rank their distressing symptoms across a number of domains including spiritual, social, psychological and physical. ‘Preliminary results show that the DT is enabling nursing and medical staff to move into domains that they would previously have found difficult,’ said Dr Kalus, ‘and also to make more appropriate referrals to the relevant other professionals.’    JS
The transcript is available at


Loneliness and Alzheimer’s

WHEREAS past research has found objectively measured social isolation is a risk factor for developing Alzheimer’s disease, a new American study has controlled for social isolation and looked instead at how lonely participants actually felt. Robert Wilson and colleagues (Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center) followed 823 older adults, all dementia-free at the start of the study, for up to four years. During that time 76 of the participants developed Alzheimer’s disease. Crucially, those participants who reported feeling the most lonely were twice as likely to have developed the illness. The findings are published in the Archives of General Psychiatry.   CJ


Bad apples at work

AT WORK it’s all too easy for a single negative team member to have a disproportionately bad effect on the whole group – for a single bad apple to spoil the barrel, so to speak – according to a literature review by researchers at the University of Washington Business School.
Writing in the latest volume of Research in Organisational Behaviour, Will Felps and colleagues identified three key ways that a team member can exert a negative influence: by withholding effort; by having negative mood and morale; and by violating interpersonal norms, for example by making inappropriate religious or ethnic remarks. If other team members have the power and confidence to do so, such behaviours are most successfully reacted to either by attempting to motivate the negative person or by rejecting them from the group. However, the literature suggests that all too often the reaction of the rest of the team is one of defensiveness, including acts of revenge, seeking distraction or even lashing out, all of which ultimately lead to members withdrawing from the group.
According to the analysis, a team member who fails to make enough effort can provoke feelings of inequality among other group members; a member with negative mood can spread their poor morale throughout the group; while the violation of interpersonal norms usually undermines trust. The extent of these negative effects is moderated by the intensity of the negative team member’s actions and behaviour; by the group’s interdependence; by whether or not the group succeeds in its goals; and by individual team members’ coping abilities.
Lead author Will Felps told The Psychologist: ‘The lesson of this research is that, in the workplace, “bad is stronger than good”. We pay attention to, ruminate on, gossip about, and feel more impactfully the interactions that we have with negative people. As such, companies should take the “bad apple” problem seriously.’
Felps said that while managers often pay an inordinate amount of attention to employees’ technical skills and the hours that they work, they rarely measure (or even recognise) the degree to which someone undermines their fellow workers. ‘Paying more attention to the negative social dynamics produced by “bad apples” can be one of the smartest ways to improve the bottom line,’ he told us.    CJ


Collaboration between Society and EMAP

HUNDREDS of thousands of people are being given the chance to learn how psychology can improve well-being and quality of life thanks to a new venture between the Society and the magazine publisher EMAP.
Featured in March’s edition of Top Santé magazine is a 28-page supplement – Happy New You – a commercial but ad-free publication produced with direct input from the Society. This is the first opportunity the Society has had to shape editorial and provide exposure of psychology to an audience that would otherwise be hard to reach. It is hoped the publication will reach more than 443,000 readers, predominantly women aged between 30 and 50 years of age.
The supplement is set to be produced twice-yearly and is specifically aimed at the consumer market, rather than practising or academic psychologists, thus allowing the Society to honour its obligations under the Royal Charter to actively engage with the public.
The Society is covering the print costs, and staff and members have been working closely with Top Santé writers to ensure the copy within the

BPS Members can discuss this article

Already a member? Or Create an account

Not a member? Find out about becoming a member or subscriber