Psychologist logo
Clinical

Suicidality – what is ‘help’?

John Raven writes.

04 December 2017

The BPS position statement Understanding and Preventing Suicide: A Psychological Perspective (to which attention is drawn in the November issue of The Psychologist) may appear to be benign. But, in reality, it further marginalises the increasing number of people who, while still of sound mind, wish to choose to die by a means of their own choosing. Its tone and approach supports those, including often incomprehensibly vicious police, who feel they have a right to impose, on others, by force if necessary, activities which they believe to be good and right (often claiming that they are in the recipients’ best interests) without regard for many of the consequences for those concerned.

The right to life has become, not merely corrupted into a requirement to live (under any circumstances), but also into policies to further constrict access to arrangements which would enable those who wish to die in their own way to do just that. (For example, access to drugs and deployable bridges is to be further restricted.) The degrading conditions in which many older people are forced to live out their lives in state-mandated regimes of ‘care’ are becoming well known. But they are hardly better than the lifestyles imposed on many by the destitution manufactured by the ‘benefits’ system. As psychologists, we would do better to examine and challenge the thoughtways and processes which promote these conditions rather than promoting psycho-medical ‘cures’ for the problems they create at an individual level. How does the way we organise work and society promote isolation, depression and numerous other ‘medical’ conditions?

More basically still, we would do better to examine the social processes which so often corrupt what appear to be well-intentioned social policies into their opposites: How a does a right to ‘education” and personal development become a compulsion to submit to endless destructive treatments at the hands of ‘welfare’ agencies? How does a right to work become a compulsion to spend one’s time applying for non-existent zero-hours contract jobs and one’s days travelling to those workplaces?

One could have hoped for a more balanced statement – preferably one avoiding the pejorative and prejudicial term suicide itself: While the majority of the population support a right to die by a means of one’s own choosing (and obtain assistance in so doing), there is much less support for the notion of assisted suicide.

It is extraordinary that psychologists are much more willing to go to great lengths to provide services to ‘help’ people to stay alive even if they wish to die than to help them to die in a manner of their own choosing if they wish so to do.

John Raven
Edinburgh